<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Updated Review: Scrivener, a tool for writers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bradsreader.com/2009/09/updated-review-scrivener-tool-for-writers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bradsreader.com/2009/09/updated-review-scrivener-tool-for-writers/</link>
	<description>All Things Literature &#38; Writing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:37:17 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brad Vertrees</title>
		<link>http://www.bradsreader.com/2009/09/updated-review-scrivener-tool-for-writers/comment-page-1/#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Vertrees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradsreader.com/?p=1295#comment-481</guid>
		<description>Hi Kellie! Thank you for your comment!

I was not aware that Scrivener could not handle large amounts of data. That would certainly be a problem for someone with lots of research material. I will have to look at your recommendation DevonThink Pro. I&#039;m always open to new tools to make writing easier.

For now I&#039;m content to use my OpenOffice (for Mac) word processor. It has all the functionality of MS Word and I can fire it up and just start typing. As I mentioned in the post, most of my notes and outlines are handwritten. That&#039;s just how I work.

Definitely look into using NeoOffice (for PC). The word processor is great and because it&#039;s open source, the program is always being improved and updated. Best of all...it&#039;s free!

Thanks again for your comment and I hope to see you around Brad&#039;s Reader again!

-Brad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kellie! Thank you for your comment!</p>
<p>I was not aware that Scrivener could not handle large amounts of data. That would certainly be a problem for someone with lots of research material. I will have to look at your recommendation DevonThink Pro. I&#8217;m always open to new tools to make writing easier.</p>
<p>For now I&#8217;m content to use my OpenOffice (for Mac) word processor. It has all the functionality of MS Word and I can fire it up and just start typing. As I mentioned in the post, most of my notes and outlines are handwritten. That&#8217;s just how I work.</p>
<p>Definitely look into using NeoOffice (for PC). The word processor is great and because it&#8217;s open source, the program is always being improved and updated. Best of all&#8230;it&#8217;s free!</p>
<p>Thanks again for your comment and I hope to see you around Brad&#8217;s Reader again!</p>
<p>-Brad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellie</title>
		<link>http://www.bradsreader.com/2009/09/updated-review-scrivener-tool-for-writers/comment-page-1/#comment-480</link>
		<dc:creator>Kellie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradsreader.com/?p=1295#comment-480</guid>
		<description>I like Scrivener, but I do agree that there is a fairly large learning curve in order to get the most use out of it. So far, I just haven&#039;t had the time to dedicate to that curve. Mostly though, my issue with Scrivener is that it cannot hold vast amounts of data: the index card function is great, but it it can only so much research material before it chokes.

So my primary writing tool is actually a project management tool: DevonThink Pro (http://www.devon-technologies.com/products/devonthink/index.html). It&#039;s quite ugly (though far less ugly since it&#039;s recent redesign), but it is an absolute workhorse when it comes to organizing information, archiving web pages (which for my purposes is a necessity), compiling different media documents together in one place. The actual word processor part of DevonThink is terrible: it has no real understanding of formatting pages or layout. But it is indestructible in terms of data capacity, so it&#039;s a great place to throw together notes and write early drafts when the look of the content doesn&#039;t matter yet. I usually write the first few drafts of a piece in DevonThink, then once I feel like I&#039;m entering a middle stage where seeing the work properly on the page would help and I don&#039;t need to reference research documents as often, I switch over to Word or Scrivener. DevonThink also has a really good search function.

Thanks for the recommendation of NeoOffice: always nice to have Word alternatives.  If only DevonThink had a true word processor integrated into it, I would use it for everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Scrivener, but I do agree that there is a fairly large learning curve in order to get the most use out of it. So far, I just haven&#8217;t had the time to dedicate to that curve. Mostly though, my issue with Scrivener is that it cannot hold vast amounts of data: the index card function is great, but it it can only so much research material before it chokes.</p>
<p>So my primary writing tool is actually a project management tool: DevonThink Pro (<a href="http://www.devon-technologies.com/products/devonthink/index.html)" rel="nofollow">http://www.devon-technologies.com/products/devonthink/index.html)</a>. It&#8217;s quite ugly (though far less ugly since it&#8217;s recent redesign), but it is an absolute workhorse when it comes to organizing information, archiving web pages (which for my purposes is a necessity), compiling different media documents together in one place. The actual word processor part of DevonThink is terrible: it has no real understanding of formatting pages or layout. But it is indestructible in terms of data capacity, so it&#8217;s a great place to throw together notes and write early drafts when the look of the content doesn&#8217;t matter yet. I usually write the first few drafts of a piece in DevonThink, then once I feel like I&#8217;m entering a middle stage where seeing the work properly on the page would help and I don&#8217;t need to reference research documents as often, I switch over to Word or Scrivener. DevonThink also has a really good search function.</p>
<p>Thanks for the recommendation of NeoOffice: always nice to have Word alternatives.  If only DevonThink had a true word processor integrated into it, I would use it for everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
