<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Self-publishing exposed!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bradsreader.com/2008/06/self-publishing-exposed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bradsreader.com/2008/06/self-publishing-exposed/</link>
	<description>All Things Literature &#38; Writing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:15:20 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Watts</title>
		<link>http://www.bradsreader.com/2008/06/self-publishing-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-1112</link>
		<dc:creator>David Watts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 22:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradsreader.com.s47315.gridserver.com/2008/06/self-publishing-exposed/#comment-1112</guid>
		<description>Hi Brad,
To a degree self-publishing depends on the subject. Mt web site, among other things, advertises my self-published book with the same title. It is specifically directed towards glass collectors and historians so I have a target market and it is selling well enough to cover my out of pocket expenses. Also, I am already a recognised authority in the field which must help.

Friends have told me that the royalty return from their commercially published books is so small at hardly be worth the bother. If the book is any good there is, however, the cudos of an enhanced reputation associated with reaching a larger potential market if that it the aim.

On the other hand an overseas friend with  a sense of nostalgia wants to publish a book of anecdotes or stories about his experiences in his town before leaving the country, followed by, perhaps, a book of poetry. I can see no clear target audience for such projects which must surely be just for self satisfaction.

I can only say that my self-publishing project, involving my own design work and using a private printer was both great fun and a rewarding experience in its own right. Promotion through a local glass club, on the web and via my ISBN number seems to work well enough to engender orders from both Europe and America as well as at home. So I would advise those interested to have a go but start with a very modest print number of just a few copies to test its potential before lashing out on a more extravagant basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brad,<br />
To a degree self-publishing depends on the subject. Mt web site, among other things, advertises my self-published book with the same title. It is specifically directed towards glass collectors and historians so I have a target market and it is selling well enough to cover my out of pocket expenses. Also, I am already a recognised authority in the field which must help.</p>
<p>Friends have told me that the royalty return from their commercially published books is so small at hardly be worth the bother. If the book is any good there is, however, the cudos of an enhanced reputation associated with reaching a larger potential market if that it the aim.</p>
<p>On the other hand an overseas friend with  a sense of nostalgia wants to publish a book of anecdotes or stories about his experiences in his town before leaving the country, followed by, perhaps, a book of poetry. I can see no clear target audience for such projects which must surely be just for self satisfaction.</p>
<p>I can only say that my self-publishing project, involving my own design work and using a private printer was both great fun and a rewarding experience in its own right. Promotion through a local glass club, on the web and via my ISBN number seems to work well enough to engender orders from both Europe and America as well as at home. So I would advise those interested to have a go but start with a very modest print number of just a few copies to test its potential before lashing out on a more extravagant basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greer</title>
		<link>http://www.bradsreader.com/2008/06/self-publishing-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Greer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradsreader.com.s47315.gridserver.com/2008/06/self-publishing-exposed/#comment-171</guid>
		<description>Hi Brad, I&#039;m new to your site- I linked here through Writing Forward- and I just wanted to tell you how much I like it.  It&#039;s so positive and informative.  I really like this post and the one about chapbooks.
I&#039;ve heard only negative things about self-publishing and it is so refreshing to get another take on it.  Your points make much more sense.  Plus, I always admire the indie spirit!
Thanks so much.  I subscribed through Google Reader so I&#039;ll be checking back regularly.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brad, I&#8217;m new to your site- I linked here through Writing Forward- and I just wanted to tell you how much I like it.  It&#8217;s so positive and informative.  I really like this post and the one about chapbooks.<br />
I&#8217;ve heard only negative things about self-publishing and it is so refreshing to get another take on it.  Your points make much more sense.  Plus, I always admire the indie spirit!<br />
Thanks so much.  I subscribed through Google Reader so I&#8217;ll be checking back regularly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaden @ Screenwriting for Hollywood</title>
		<link>http://www.bradsreader.com/2008/06/self-publishing-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaden @ Screenwriting for Hollywood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 03:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradsreader.com.s47315.gridserver.com/2008/06/self-publishing-exposed/#comment-172</guid>
		<description>Most interesting topic. Yes, to sell oneself to a large publisher, they are interested in people with large followings. This new angle, resulting from the Internet, has bit them in the foot because they will sign deals with bloggers who are great at rambling daily and having a big audience, but are terrible writers (in the classic and grammatical sense) who can&#039;t carry a solid full length story.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most interesting topic. Yes, to sell oneself to a large publisher, they are interested in people with large followings. This new angle, resulting from the Internet, has bit them in the foot because they will sign deals with bloggers who are great at rambling daily and having a big audience, but are terrible writers (in the classic and grammatical sense) who can&#8217;t carry a solid full length story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: czar</title>
		<link>http://www.bradsreader.com/2008/06/self-publishing-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>czar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 02:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradsreader.com.s47315.gridserver.com/2008/06/self-publishing-exposed/#comment-173</guid>
		<description>As a full-time freelance editor/indexer/proofreader who works for both royalty presses (mostly university and denominational; some trade) and self-publishing authors and houses, I can say that I&#039;ve seen many good self-published books, and many awful books being produced by royalty presses. When I am bold enough to ask about the latter, I&#039;ve been told such things as, &quot;We had a six-book contract with the author, and we&#039;re so ready to be done with her that we&#039;re publishing this last one no matter what.&quot; I&#039;ve rewritten books for such authors that have come to me for copyediting but which really needed a total overhaul . . . and the publisher agreed, but just didn&#039;t want to devote in-house resources to it. What I tell people now from my 30 years of experience is that the quality of the manuscript is often not even among the top five reasons you may or may not be accepted by a royalty publisher. Small consolation.
Many authors of nonfiction are ultimately responsible for their own indexes, and a bad index can turn a good book into an unmarketable one very quickly, given that the human tendency for right-handed people is to flip from back to front. Bad index = no sale. If you&#039;re an author wanting a great index by a professional in the field, check me out: boblandedits.blogspot.com.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a full-time freelance editor/indexer/proofreader who works for both royalty presses (mostly university and denominational; some trade) and self-publishing authors and houses, I can say that I&#8217;ve seen many good self-published books, and many awful books being produced by royalty presses. When I am bold enough to ask about the latter, I&#8217;ve been told such things as, &#8220;We had a six-book contract with the author, and we&#8217;re so ready to be done with her that we&#8217;re publishing this last one no matter what.&#8221; I&#8217;ve rewritten books for such authors that have come to me for copyediting but which really needed a total overhaul . . . and the publisher agreed, but just didn&#8217;t want to devote in-house resources to it. What I tell people now from my 30 years of experience is that the quality of the manuscript is often not even among the top five reasons you may or may not be accepted by a royalty publisher. Small consolation.<br />
Many authors of nonfiction are ultimately responsible for their own indexes, and a bad index can turn a good book into an unmarketable one very quickly, given that the human tendency for right-handed people is to flip from back to front. Bad index = no sale. If you&#8217;re an author wanting a great index by a professional in the field, check me out: boblandedits.blogspot.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
