http://www.bradsreader.com/2008/04/wikipedia-to-be-published-in-print/ All Things Literature & Writing Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:59:07 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 http://www.bradsreader.com/2008/04/wikipedia-to-be-published-in-print/comment-page-1/#comment-189 Jess Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:56:28 +0000 http://bradsreader.com.s47315.gridserver.com/2008/04/wikipedia-to-be-published-in-print/#comment-189 I totally agree with your take about this. I believe that Wikipedia is the most recognized online encyclopedia but as a book? I don't think it would be successful because why pay for something that's well, online and free? In addition, it is always changing! I totally agree with your take about this. I believe that Wikipedia is the most recognized online encyclopedia but as a book? I don’t think it would be successful because why pay for something that’s well, online and free? In addition, it is always changing!

]]> http://www.bradsreader.com/2008/04/wikipedia-to-be-published-in-print/comment-page-1/#comment-190 Susan Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:15:39 +0000 http://bradsreader.com.s47315.gridserver.com/2008/04/wikipedia-to-be-published-in-print/#comment-190 I really frankly see no benefit to having Wikipedia in print. Wokipedia is an online resource, plain and simple. Nobody out there is trying to transcribe nightly newscasts into books, are they? I really frankly see no benefit to having Wikipedia in print. Wokipedia is an online resource, plain and simple. Nobody out there is trying to transcribe nightly newscasts into books, are they?

]]>